Total war rome 2 vs attila12/28/2022 Though AI gets sanitation bonuses and rarely handles its food shortages.ĪTW has some interesting stuff with both roman factions and migrating tribes, so those campaings can be played different ways. So if you like that kind of stuff, Attila has more campaign map stuff. Attila has family tree back and so politics in the faction feel more real.Īttilas has more empire management, aside from PO you need to watch out food shortages and diseases etc. Rome 2 has broken politics system but, no family tree so it all makes it pointless. I feel Attila probably has a better timeframe than Napoleon, however it still doesn't compare to that of the Roman Republic, Hellenistic Kingdoms and similar. Napoleon is a much better game under of those features, however due to its short timeframe and lack of global map, it's not a game you can play that much.Ĭan you name some elements that make Rome 2 incomplete or broken compared to Attila? Combine this with the fact that most units are the same for too many factions, essentially line infantry and every battle feels exactly the same, which gets boring really soon. Battlefields corresponding the the map was a superb feature of previous games, not sure why they removed it in Empire, but it's back in Napoleon. speaking of India, the Marathas.just what the hell, they overrun the Mughals then become the wealthiest factions even without developing much I can't dedicate every game to stopping the Orange wave the AI often does not develop resources, especially outside Europe, while relies on income boosts due to the difficulty sets to run the economy that's just unbearable if you plain long enough, manage to conquer some British or Spanish colony, just to find out that the AI doesn't do anything with them. Because when I look at Empire and Napoleon, there are essentially 3 elements that make Empire an uncomplete or broken game:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |